1. All Articles
  2. Publications
  3. Noble News and Views
  4. 2016
  5. June

Intuitive assessment aids stocking rate management

  Estimated read time:

Although rainfall can vary significantly from season to season, year to year, it is difficult to know for certain if and when adjustments to cattle stocking rates are warranted without having a professional pasture and range specialist make a thorough assessment of the property. It is a good idea to utilize a pasture and range professional when convenient, but even they prefer to have the producer's input and experience readily available to factor into their projections. A producer with several years of experience with a property can make a determination on whether or not adjustments to the long-term stocking rate are needed by using his or her own intuition and observations.

There are two approaches to determining stocking rate adjustments: professional and intuitive. The professional approach, although thorough, requires a professional trained in pasture and range management to develop. The intuitive approach, although not as technical, can still answer the question of whether or not ranch conditions warrant stocking rate adjustments. The intuitive approach utilizes a producer's experience and historical ranch information.

Start by creating an intuitive assessment table similar to the one in Table 1. Notice that the columns across the top indicate the time periods of interest. This can be a series of annual assessments or, as in this table, periods of years that are of significant interest based on long- and near-time weather events. For this example, we are comparing recent years to the drought years (2011-2012) and then previous years covering two eras.

Table 1.

The next step is to list the important, easily monitored variables. In the simplest form, these include stocking rate, average annual rainfall and percent deviation from average, pasture condition ratings, average cow herd body condition score, months of hay feeding, and months of native grass residual grazing remaining. Apply a four-rating system with each of the variables along with a "heat map" or color-coded system (from highest to lowest rating: green, white, yellow and red).

The stocking rate numbers for each time period are averages except for the drought years (lowest number) and current years (current stock number). Rainfall information is based on actual information if you have the records or from the nearest weather station. Pasture condition ratings, cow body condition scores, months of hay feeding and months of native grass residual grazing remaining are based on the producer's experience and observations. To make this tool work for the designed purpose, producers have to be honest with themselves and complete the table as conservatively as possible.

If the "heat map" shows lots of green and white space, especially in recent years, the producer may have the opportunity to adjust the stocking rate upward. However, if the table shows red and yellow, the producer should consider adjusting the stocking rate downward, or at the very least it indicates room for improvement in certain management areas.

This intuitive approach to determining if stocking rate adjustments are warranted allows a producer to utilize his or her experience and ranch information to subjectively answer stocking rate questions. The professional approach is often more objective in process, but it does not take into consideration the value of trends over time as does the intuitive approach. The producer's intuition and experience is not as dated as a professional stocking rate estimate would be.

Hugh Aljoe serves as the director of producer relations (consultation and ranch management) and a pasture and range consultant. He has been associated with Noble Research Institute since 1995. Prior to coming to Noble, he managed a 3,000-acre 1,500-head cattle operation in Texas. Hugh received his master’s degree in range science from Texas A&M University with emphasis in grazing management.